Lance's Blog
- Iran not a threat
- Eight percent of New Jersey residents think Obama’s the Antichrist
- Protesters should be probed for racist thoughts
- Reality Check: 45% of doctors would consider quitting under Obamacare
- House Guidelines on what you can call the President
- More propaganda from the far left: The Glenn Beck Boycott
- Obama calls Kanye a jackass
- Another Big Labor payoff that will cost American jobs
- Lance is Back!
- Court: Employer must pay for weight-loss surgery
- National Security Adviser Says President Obama Is Having Greater Success Taking Out Terrorists
- Denton Texas public transit system to cut routes
- Jackson and Fawcett died today
- San Francisco to fine you when you throw away food scraps!
- Obama Admin: Rein in pay in US private sector
- Are Americans really turning their back on gas guzzlers?
- FDIC pushing for shake-up at Citigroup
- Microsoft: Tax would move jobs offshore
- SHOCKER: Man Mows Down Traffic Cop to Avoid Parking Ticket
- Biden on Gitmo: "It's Like Opening Pandora's Box"
| Word of the day: Nationalization |
|
|
| The Lance Haynie Blog | |||||||||
| Written by Lance R. Haynie | |||||||||
| Tuesday, 09 December 2008 12:37 | |||||||||
That almost doesn't sound like something that a far left politician would say, but does he mean it? I personally do not think he does. He went onto describe what equated to long term government bailouts. These bailouts would have conditions for government oversight on the industry. Basically, the government would mandate what kind of cars companies could make, what mileage and environmental standards they must meet, and what they can invest in. Obama wants to create an industry that "actually works, that actually functions." To me it sounds like that word that the Obama campaign tries to hide from so much: Nationalization. Now for a history lesson: Harry Truman seized our steel mills in the 1950's rather than allow a strike or them to fix their own problems. Not since then have we had Washington toying with nationalization. Now you may say that we are not truly nationalizing, they will still be private entities. Seriously though, this is the functional equivalent. If the companies have private people running it, but the government telling them exactly what to do and how to do it, thats nationalization anyway you try to poetically word it. Actually Truman was quoted as saying "The president has the power to keep the country from going to hell." Maybe Obama is taking that view on his role as President. Don't forget though, the Supreme Court took that view a little differently and forced Truman to relinquish control. The scary part of it all is their is so little protest about it. We have more people whining about calling in gay than we have people worried about the government seizing control of everything. Even Obama stated that the governments record as corporate managers is dismal at best. The scariest part of all is if these efforts to nationalize fail. If American automotive companies fail and are sold to foreign competitors or investors for fractions of what it should have cost, Americans will lose billions. We have to look like a group of hypocrites to other nations, not that I care. The point being how can we go around preaching capitalism to the world, then go against that very word. How do you expect anyone to take us seriously if we don't even follow what we tell everyone else they should be doing? The scope of this bailout is mind boggling, and the government is playing with trillions of our tax dollars and no one seems to care. This is our money, we should have a say in this.
Note: This section is for comments from the Lance Haynie Show's community of readers. Please do not assume that the Lance Haynie Show agrees or endorses any comment made by said reader. Any person who fails to comply with our Terms of Use my be subject to losing their posting privileges.
Only registered users can write comments!
|














